<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s The &#8220;Big Idea?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://copywritersroundtable.com/2010/03/09/whats-the-big-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://copywritersroundtable.com/2010/03/09/whats-the-big-idea/</link>
	<description>Sign up and get your FREE report!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://copywritersroundtable.com/2010/03/09/whats-the-big-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-4655</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywritersroundtable.com/?p=660#comment-4655</guid>
		<description>Yes... though I think you&#039;re right in the first part of your statement too. It&#039;s implied. Especially in the sense that part of what makes the idea strong is that it&#039;s &lt;em&gt;already&lt;/em&gt; connected to something in the prospect&#039;s psyche. In that sense, they&#039;re memorable to whomever you&#039;re writing to... before you even come along to propose them. You&#039;re putting a twist on what the target reader already feels deeply to be true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes&#8230; though I think you&#8217;re right in the first part of your statement too. It&#8217;s implied. Especially in the sense that part of what makes the idea strong is that it&#8217;s <em>already</em> connected to something in the prospect&#8217;s psyche. In that sense, they&#8217;re memorable to whomever you&#8217;re writing to&#8230; before you even come along to propose them. You&#8217;re putting a twist on what the target reader already feels deeply to be true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackforde</title>
		<link>http://copywritersroundtable.com/2010/03/09/whats-the-big-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-4539</link>
		<dc:creator>jackforde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 13:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywritersroundtable.com/?p=660#comment-4539</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome... and good luck with the 33-minute trick. I know it works well for me and for the colleagues who&#039;ve tried it. 

About the post-article &quot;blank&quot; you mention, I can sympathize. In fact, after I wrap up a big project, I look forward to that feeling. 

Not that I don&#039;t always have something else waiting that I need to start... usually, I do. But I think you need to have a buffer in there, whether it&#039;s the weekend or just an hour doing something else, before you lock into the next period of intense focus. 

As soon as I hit &quot;send&quot; on a big file, the first thing I do is go through and sort through files on my computer desktop... putting away links and clips I&#039;ve pulled for the project, going over and organizing the other things I need to do, answering the email that&#039;s piled up. It&#039;s like putting away tools after fixing a car or hanging a portrait. Or tying off the last of the loose strings.  Then I make a list of what I need to do next and where, specifically, I&#039;ll start... and I take a break.

As for getting started again, I almost always go from ground zero... piling up the research, digging in, and pouring every bit of information or story or supporting image I can gather into a file to be organized later. 

Others might be able to just start writing, but personally I don&#039;t think the process starts until you&#039;ve mastered all those details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome&#8230; and good luck with the 33-minute trick. I know it works well for me and for the colleagues who&#8217;ve tried it. </p>
<p>About the post-article &#8220;blank&#8221; you mention, I can sympathize. In fact, after I wrap up a big project, I look forward to that feeling. </p>
<p>Not that I don&#8217;t always have something else waiting that I need to start&#8230; usually, I do. But I think you need to have a buffer in there, whether it&#8217;s the weekend or just an hour doing something else, before you lock into the next period of intense focus. </p>
<p>As soon as I hit &#8220;send&#8221; on a big file, the first thing I do is go through and sort through files on my computer desktop&#8230; putting away links and clips I&#8217;ve pulled for the project, going over and organizing the other things I need to do, answering the email that&#8217;s piled up. It&#8217;s like putting away tools after fixing a car or hanging a portrait. Or tying off the last of the loose strings.  Then I make a list of what I need to do next and where, specifically, I&#8217;ll start&#8230; and I take a break.</p>
<p>As for getting started again, I almost always go from ground zero&#8230; piling up the research, digging in, and pouring every bit of information or story or supporting image I can gather into a file to be organized later. </p>
<p>Others might be able to just start writing, but personally I don&#8217;t think the process starts until you&#8217;ve mastered all those details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://copywritersroundtable.com/2010/03/09/whats-the-big-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-4518</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 23:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywritersroundtable.com/?p=660#comment-4518</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info.  I&#039;m going to try that 33 minute technique for article writing. The problem I&#039;m currently facing is after I write one article my brain completely goes blank and it takes at least 8-10 hours to even think about writing the next article. If I follow those 10 minute formulas it works but I&#039;m not satisfied with the output.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info.  I&#8217;m going to try that 33 minute technique for article writing. The problem I&#8217;m currently facing is after I write one article my brain completely goes blank and it takes at least 8-10 hours to even think about writing the next article. If I follow those 10 minute formulas it works but I&#8217;m not satisfied with the output.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackforde</title>
		<link>http://copywritersroundtable.com/2010/03/09/whats-the-big-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-4228</link>
		<dc:creator>jackforde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywritersroundtable.com/?p=660#comment-4228</guid>
		<description>Yes... though I think you&#039;re right in the first part of your statement too. It&#039;s implied. Especially in the sense that part of what makes the idea strong is that it&#039;s &lt;em&gt;already&lt;/em&gt; connected to something in the prospect&#039;s psyche. In that sense, they&#039;re memorable to whomever you&#039;re writing to... before you even come along to propose them. You&#039;re putting a twist on what the target reader already feels deeply to be true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes&#8230; though I think you&#8217;re right in the first part of your statement too. It&#8217;s implied. Especially in the sense that part of what makes the idea strong is that it&#8217;s <em>already</em> connected to something in the prospect&#8217;s psyche. In that sense, they&#8217;re memorable to whomever you&#8217;re writing to&#8230; before you even come along to propose them. You&#8217;re putting a twist on what the target reader already feels deeply to be true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://copywritersroundtable.com/2010/03/09/whats-the-big-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-4217</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copywritersroundtable.com/?p=660#comment-4217</guid>
		<description>It may be implied, but big ideas should be memorable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be implied, but big ideas should be memorable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

